<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Botanical Illustration: Rosehips	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/</link>
	<description>Natural History Illustration - for books, magazines &#38; packaging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2025 22:14:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lizzie Harper		</title>
		<link>https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-10558</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lizzie Harper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2025 22:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lizzieharper.co.uk/?p=7426#comment-10558</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-10520&quot;&gt;Susana Smith&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Susana

I cant remember the details, Im afraid, but think its a &quot;half inferior&quot; or perygynous&quot; ovary.  Maybe this article will do a better job of explaining than I can? https://stbarbebaker.wordpress.com/2019/06/21/rose-reproduction/ Hope you untangle it soon, its always done my head in, ovaries.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-10520">Susana Smith</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Susana</p>
<p>I cant remember the details, Im afraid, but think its a &#8220;half inferior&#8221; or perygynous&#8221; ovary.  Maybe this article will do a better job of explaining than I can? <a href="https://stbarbebaker.wordpress.com/2019/06/21/rose-reproduction/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://stbarbebaker.wordpress.com/2019/06/21/rose-reproduction/</a> Hope you untangle it soon, its always done my head in, ovaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Susana Smith		</title>
		<link>https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-10520</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susana Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 13:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lizzieharper.co.uk/?p=7426#comment-10520</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Lizzie

Thanks so much for this info.  I&#039;m researching the gallica rose, &#039;Violacea&#039; fir a botanical illustration course and am confused about information I&#039;ve found which says it has a Superior ovary, &quot;meaning it&#039;s above the points where the sepals and petals attach to the flower&quot;.
Surely it&#039;s below the sepals and petals, as the rosehip itself (containing the ovules which eventually become the fruits) is below the sepals and petals?
Regards,
Susana]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lizzie</p>
<p>Thanks so much for this info.  I&#8217;m researching the gallica rose, &#8216;Violacea&#8217; fir a botanical illustration course and am confused about information I&#8217;ve found which says it has a Superior ovary, &#8220;meaning it&#8217;s above the points where the sepals and petals attach to the flower&#8221;.<br />
Surely it&#8217;s below the sepals and petals, as the rosehip itself (containing the ovules which eventually become the fruits) is below the sepals and petals?<br />
Regards,<br />
Susana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lizzie Harper		</title>
		<link>https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-9686</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lizzie Harper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lizzieharper.co.uk/?p=7426#comment-9686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-9662&quot;&gt;Steve Young&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Steve

THANKYOU so much for this.  I write these blogs to try and understand the botany that I learn as I go along, and clarification like this is incredibly helpful.  And the slight variations in the terminology and when its&#039; used can be deadly unless you truly know your stuff.  So thankyou.  I will edit and update the bloog now, thanks to your input.  Much appreciated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-9662">Steve Young</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Steve</p>
<p>THANKYOU so much for this.  I write these blogs to try and understand the botany that I learn as I go along, and clarification like this is incredibly helpful.  And the slight variations in the terminology and when its&#8217; used can be deadly unless you truly know your stuff.  So thankyou.  I will edit and update the bloog now, thanks to your input.  Much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Young		</title>
		<link>https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-9662</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Young]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2024 20:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lizzieharper.co.uk/?p=7426#comment-9662</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You mention that pineapples have fleshy parts from the hypanthium but they are actually multiple fruits (berries) that have all coalesced from multiple flowers, and called multiple fruits. What you call false fruits are also called accessory fruits. Fruits from multiple ovaries in a single fruit are called accessory fruits like blackberries. Therefore a strawberry is an aggregate accessory fruit since the fleshy part is not part of the ovary and many ovaries from one flower that formed achenes are on one fruit. Sometimes the word compound fruit is used to encompass accessory and multiple fruits.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mention that pineapples have fleshy parts from the hypanthium but they are actually multiple fruits (berries) that have all coalesced from multiple flowers, and called multiple fruits. What you call false fruits are also called accessory fruits. Fruits from multiple ovaries in a single fruit are called accessory fruits like blackberries. Therefore a strawberry is an aggregate accessory fruit since the fleshy part is not part of the ovary and many ovaries from one flower that formed achenes are on one fruit. Sometimes the word compound fruit is used to encompass accessory and multiple fruits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lizzie Harper		</title>
		<link>https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-8946</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lizzie Harper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 23:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lizzieharper.co.uk/?p=7426#comment-8946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-8944&quot;&gt;Tudor Ursu&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Tudor

Your English is impeccable, and I dont think I would have noticed unless you mentioned it.  I totally understand the idea of getting rosehips with less fuzz on.  I&#039;m not sure if anyone has bred roses with less of this.  I do know that generally people suggest the Dog Rose Rosa canina as the bes tone for hips though, but then you know that already.  Scooting around online, the only term Ive been able to find for the fuzz is &quot;hairs&quot; or &quot;seed hairs&quot; which feels unsatisfactory to me.  And yes, I think there&#039;s every likelihood that the hairs have analogous structures in other seeds, although I can&#039;[t think what they might be.  I wish I could be more help!  Interesting question though.  And thatnks for the comment.  x]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-8944">Tudor Ursu</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Tudor</p>
<p>Your English is impeccable, and I dont think I would have noticed unless you mentioned it.  I totally understand the idea of getting rosehips with less fuzz on.  I&#8217;m not sure if anyone has bred roses with less of this.  I do know that generally people suggest the Dog Rose Rosa canina as the bes tone for hips though, but then you know that already.  Scooting around online, the only term Ive been able to find for the fuzz is &#8220;hairs&#8221; or &#8220;seed hairs&#8221; which feels unsatisfactory to me.  And yes, I think there&#8217;s every likelihood that the hairs have analogous structures in other seeds, although I can'[t think what they might be.  I wish I could be more help!  Interesting question though.  And thatnks for the comment.  x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tudor Ursu		</title>
		<link>https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-8944</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tudor Ursu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lizzieharper.co.uk/?p=7426#comment-8944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you for the beautiful drawings and explanations! Perhaps you can help me with my quest: I enjoy eating rosehips in winter but, of course, I am annoyed that I have to be extra careful not to swallow the fuzzy hairs covering the seeds or get them to irritate my tongue. I was wondering whether, among so many cultivars with different flower colors and shapes, somebody has not selected one that lacks the irritating hairs within the hypanthium. For this, I tried to find out which is the embryonic origin of the hairs, for keywords to help my search (I&#039;m not a native English speaker as you probably realized). It&#039;s also possible that nobody has since there is no big economic incentive for this. I imagine that if we compare the rosehip with a curved sunflower inflorescence, that the hairs would correspond to hairs on the calyx or to simplified floral bracts. What do you think? Thank you!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the beautiful drawings and explanations! Perhaps you can help me with my quest: I enjoy eating rosehips in winter but, of course, I am annoyed that I have to be extra careful not to swallow the fuzzy hairs covering the seeds or get them to irritate my tongue. I was wondering whether, among so many cultivars with different flower colors and shapes, somebody has not selected one that lacks the irritating hairs within the hypanthium. For this, I tried to find out which is the embryonic origin of the hairs, for keywords to help my search (I&#8217;m not a native English speaker as you probably realized). It&#8217;s also possible that nobody has since there is no big economic incentive for this. I imagine that if we compare the rosehip with a curved sunflower inflorescence, that the hairs would correspond to hairs on the calyx or to simplified floral bracts. What do you think? Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lizzie Harper		</title>
		<link>https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-1888</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lizzie Harper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lizzieharper.co.uk/?p=7426#comment-1888</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-1879&quot;&gt;Teresa Hall&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Blue,

Well, that comment led to some lively debate on Twitter when I asked the community of botanists for trheir recomendations!  Many were annoyed that their trusted books on roses did not, in fact, have much on rosehips species by species.  I can totally understand you wanting to explore this further, the idea of giving a rose to your brothers or sisters which come from the grandparents is lovely.  Especially since those memories of your youth are so happy.

The booklist I&#039;ve conjured up is pretty UK-centric, and some fo the titles are out of print.  others (like Stace) may be a bit too intense and botanical (and the stace only has 1 page of rosehip illustrations in amongst 2200+ pages of other botany identifications!)

However, for what it&#039;s worth, here&#039;s the list for you:

Recommendations for Books on Roses and Rosehips

Roses of Great Britain and Ireland, Graham, G and Primavesi, A.  BSBI Handbook No. 7
The Heritage of the Rose, Austin, D
The Peter Beales Classic Roses, Beales, P.
Roses, Philips, R. &amp; Rix, M.
New Flora of the British Isles, Stace, C.

Thanks for taking the time to leave such a lovely comment, and good luck identifying those roses!

X]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-1879">Teresa Hall</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Blue,</p>
<p>Well, that comment led to some lively debate on Twitter when I asked the community of botanists for trheir recomendations!  Many were annoyed that their trusted books on roses did not, in fact, have much on rosehips species by species.  I can totally understand you wanting to explore this further, the idea of giving a rose to your brothers or sisters which come from the grandparents is lovely.  Especially since those memories of your youth are so happy.</p>
<p>The booklist I&#8217;ve conjured up is pretty UK-centric, and some fo the titles are out of print.  others (like Stace) may be a bit too intense and botanical (and the stace only has 1 page of rosehip illustrations in amongst 2200+ pages of other botany identifications!)</p>
<p>However, for what it&#8217;s worth, here&#8217;s the list for you:</p>
<p>Recommendations for Books on Roses and Rosehips</p>
<p>Roses of Great Britain and Ireland, Graham, G and Primavesi, A.  BSBI Handbook No. 7<br />
The Heritage of the Rose, Austin, D<br />
The Peter Beales Classic Roses, Beales, P.<br />
Roses, Philips, R. &#038; Rix, M.<br />
New Flora of the British Isles, Stace, C.</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to leave such a lovely comment, and good luck identifying those roses!</p>
<p>X</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Teresa Hall		</title>
		<link>https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-1879</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Teresa Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lizzieharper.co.uk/?p=7426#comment-1879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello:  I enjoyed your post on rosehips--especially the drawings.  I was wondering if the &quot;rose type&quot; can be identified by the outer physical characteristics of the rosehip.  For sentimental reasons, I have started a project to propagate rose plants from seeds from my grandparents rosebushes.  I have noticed that some of the rosehips are sort of &quot;pumpkin shaped&quot; (and quite large--almost like golf ball but not as big) while others are &quot;pear shaped&quot; with pointy ends (kind of like a Herschy kiss chocolate), while others are more rounded like marbles.  I suspect the size and shape differences due to different species.  The rose plants are all kind of inter-tangled and the flowers are gone on most making it difficult to identify which rose family they come from. I have very fond memories of my childhood playing amongst the rose bushes--especially the scent of them when literally hundreds were in bloom.  They were the big uneven roses that you hardly see anymore.  The fact they are &quot;disheveled&quot; (not so perfect like a single stemmed rose) is what makes them that much more beautiful to me because they have character.  Do you know of a reference which outlines the differences in rosehips from the rose family?  Thank you in advance and sorry for such long explanation.   I feel like the best gift I could give my siblings is a rose bush grown from a seed from my grandparents roses.  Respectfully, Blue]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello:  I enjoyed your post on rosehips&#8211;especially the drawings.  I was wondering if the &#8220;rose type&#8221; can be identified by the outer physical characteristics of the rosehip.  For sentimental reasons, I have started a project to propagate rose plants from seeds from my grandparents rosebushes.  I have noticed that some of the rosehips are sort of &#8220;pumpkin shaped&#8221; (and quite large&#8211;almost like golf ball but not as big) while others are &#8220;pear shaped&#8221; with pointy ends (kind of like a Herschy kiss chocolate), while others are more rounded like marbles.  I suspect the size and shape differences due to different species.  The rose plants are all kind of inter-tangled and the flowers are gone on most making it difficult to identify which rose family they come from. I have very fond memories of my childhood playing amongst the rose bushes&#8211;especially the scent of them when literally hundreds were in bloom.  They were the big uneven roses that you hardly see anymore.  The fact they are &#8220;disheveled&#8221; (not so perfect like a single stemmed rose) is what makes them that much more beautiful to me because they have character.  Do you know of a reference which outlines the differences in rosehips from the rose family?  Thank you in advance and sorry for such long explanation.   I feel like the best gift I could give my siblings is a rose bush grown from a seed from my grandparents roses.  Respectfully, Blue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lizzie Harper		</title>
		<link>https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-1185</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lizzie Harper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 12:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lizzieharper.co.uk/?p=7426#comment-1185</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-1181&quot;&gt;Geraldine Garrs&lt;/a&gt;.

I am so glad to be of help!  It did my head in too - lots of my blogs start out as me being totally non-plussed about something botanical.  Thanks for letting me know it was useful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-1181">Geraldine Garrs</a>.</p>
<p>I am so glad to be of help!  It did my head in too &#8211; lots of my blogs start out as me being totally non-plussed about something botanical.  Thanks for letting me know it was useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geraldine Garrs		</title>
		<link>https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2019/05/botanical-illustration-rosehips/#comment-1181</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geraldine Garrs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 08:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lizzieharper.co.uk/?p=7426#comment-1181</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Beautiful drawing and fascinating details - I was looking for whether a &#039;hip&#039; was a fruit or a seed, and this explains it so well, and so beautifully - many thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful drawing and fascinating details &#8211; I was looking for whether a &#8216;hip&#8217; was a fruit or a seed, and this explains it so well, and so beautifully &#8211; many thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
