<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Botanical Illustration: Comparing HP Watercolour Papers 2	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2017/06/botanical-illustration-comparing-hp-watercolour-papers-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2017/06/botanical-illustration-comparing-hp-watercolour-papers-2/</link>
	<description>Natural History Illustration - for books, magazines &#38; packaging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 07:22:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lizzie Harper		</title>
		<link>https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2017/06/botanical-illustration-comparing-hp-watercolour-papers-2/#comment-10141</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lizzie Harper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 07:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lizzieharper.co.uk/?p=3091#comment-10141</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2017/06/botanical-illustration-comparing-hp-watercolour-papers-2/#comment-10126&quot;&gt;Anette&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Annette

This is interesting, and so lovely to find a paper you like.  If you can get your hands on it, try Stonehenge aqua by Legion papers too, that&#039;s another &quot;go to&quot;.  But Im pleased youve made the Fluid cellulose work for you.  Hooray!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2017/06/botanical-illustration-comparing-hp-watercolour-papers-2/#comment-10126">Anette</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Annette</p>
<p>This is interesting, and so lovely to find a paper you like.  If you can get your hands on it, try Stonehenge aqua by Legion papers too, that&#8217;s another &#8220;go to&#8221;.  But Im pleased youve made the Fluid cellulose work for you.  Hooray!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anette		</title>
		<link>https://lizzieharper.co.uk/2017/06/botanical-illustration-comparing-hp-watercolour-papers-2/#comment-10126</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anette]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2025 14:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lizzieharper.co.uk/?p=3091#comment-10126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have been trying to find an alternative to Arches Hot Press paper for botanicals, and I came across your blog posts. 

Unfortunately I can&#039;t get my hands on Fluid 100, but I have tried the cellulose version, and I have to agree - too many wet washes, and the paper is not performing well.

Still, I REALLY like the fact that there is no smell from the paper as it&#039;s a cellulose type. There is some ugly smell om Arches papers that I just hate. Really.. Yuck!

So, Fluid cellulose has actually won my heart. It is not the best for every botanical painting, but for some it works VERY well. I have found that if you let the layers dry completely between layers, you almost won&#039;t have any issues. That&#039;s my experience at least. If the paint hasn&#039;t dried completely, the colors between layers will merge a bit. 

Thank you for these posts! It has made find a new brand which I think will be really great for my paintings!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been trying to find an alternative to Arches Hot Press paper for botanicals, and I came across your blog posts. </p>
<p>Unfortunately I can&#8217;t get my hands on Fluid 100, but I have tried the cellulose version, and I have to agree &#8211; too many wet washes, and the paper is not performing well.</p>
<p>Still, I REALLY like the fact that there is no smell from the paper as it&#8217;s a cellulose type. There is some ugly smell om Arches papers that I just hate. Really.. Yuck!</p>
<p>So, Fluid cellulose has actually won my heart. It is not the best for every botanical painting, but for some it works VERY well. I have found that if you let the layers dry completely between layers, you almost won&#8217;t have any issues. That&#8217;s my experience at least. If the paint hasn&#8217;t dried completely, the colors between layers will merge a bit. </p>
<p>Thank you for these posts! It has made find a new brand which I think will be really great for my paintings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
